Digital Waqf Ecosystems: Governance, Accountability, and Inclusive Development
Keywords:
Digital waqf; Islamic social finance; governance; accountability; inclusive developmentAbstract
This study examines the development of digital waqf ecosystems and their implications for governance quality, institutional accountability, and inclusive development within Islamic social finance. Employing a qualitative research design, the study relies on secondary data drawn from peer-reviewed journal articles, policy reports, regulatory documents, and official publications of waqf authorities and digital waqf platforms. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis to identify recurring patterns related to digital governance structures, transparency mechanisms, stakeholder integration, and socioeconomic outcomes. The findings indicate that digitalization enhances waqf governance by improving transparency, traceability of funds, and institutional accountability, while also broadening participation through accessible digital platforms. However, challenges remain in regulatory harmonization, digital literacy, and institutional readiness, which may constrain inclusive impact if not adequately addressed. The study contributes to the Islamic social finance literature by offering a conceptual understanding of digital waqf as an integrated ecosystem rather than a standalone technological tool. Policy implications highlight the need for adaptive governance frameworks to ensure sustainable and inclusive digital waqf development.
References
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
Aguilera, R. V., Judge, W. Q., & Terjesen, S. A. (2015). Corporate governance deviance. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 87–109.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0394
Ali, M. M., Raza, S. A., & Puah, C. H. (2022). Digital transformation and governance in Islamic social finance institutions. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 13(4), 657–675. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-03-2021-0094
Aziz, S., & Afaq, Z. (2023). Determinants of digital waqf adoption: Evidence from Islamic philanthropy platforms. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 16(2), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-06-2021-0278
BAZNAS. (2022). National zakat and waqf digitalization report. Badan Amil Zakat Nasional.
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chapra, M. U., & Ahmed, H. (2002). Corporate governance in Islamic financial institutions. Islamic Research and Training Institute.
Cizakca, M. (2020). Islamic capital accumulation and economic development. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788970734
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Ebrahim, A., & Weisband, E. (2007). Global accountabilities: Participation, pluralism, and public ethics. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807078
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Gupta, J., Pouw, N., & Ros-Tonen, M. (2015). Towards an elaborated theory of inclusive development. European Journal of Development Research, 27(4), 541–559.
https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2015.30
Hasan, Z., & Abdullah, M. (2020). Innovative waqf models for sustainable development. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 12(1), 1–16.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-09-2019-0135
IFSB. (2009). Guiding principles on Shariah governance systems for institutions offering Islamic financial services. Islamic Financial Services Board.
Johnston, M. P. (2017). Secondary data analysis: A method of which the time has come. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 3(3), 619–626.
Kahf, M. (2018). Waqf governance and sustainability. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 9(4), 506–527.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-01-2017-0018
Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.
Rahman, M. A., Yusoff, M. E., & Mohamed, H. A. (2021). Digital waqf adoption and donor behavior. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 12(8), 1491–1508.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-04-2020-0117
UNDP. (2021). Islamic social finance and the Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations Development Programme.
World Bank. (2020). Islamic finance and social impact financing. World Bank Group.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ukanus : Indonesian Journal of Economics and Business

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




